Why rectifier is separate


Why rectifier is separate

From postmaste–(at)–uffy.demon.co.uk Wed Sep 17 13:47:23 CDT 1997
From: postmaste–(at)–uffy.demon.co.uk (Duncan Munro)
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps
Subject: Re: Rectifiers? Confused
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 18:23:18 GMT
Reply-To: postmaste–(at)–uffy.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: muffy.demon.co.uk [158.152.92.172]
Xref: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu alt.guitar.amps:64059

On 17 Sep 1997 07:23:18 GMT, usernam–(at)–hore.net (Your Name) wrote:

> Can one retrofit a tube rectifier to an amp if it does not have a spare 5
>separate filament winding ? Could you use an indirectly heated rectifier
>tube and run it off the normal 6 volt filament suooly ? has anybody done
>this ? would a better method be to use a small separate filament
>transformer to the chasis ? How do they make a dual rectifier setup?

Hi Steve,

Tube rectifiers are not normally run from the 6v filament supply, as
this would put the whole filament supply at B+ potential.

Normal tubes in a guitar amp allow a maximum filament to cathode
potential of 100V to 200V, so this would rule this one out….

Maybe a seperate transformer would be a better idea???

HTH,
Duncan


Duncan Munro
Check out http://www.muffy.demon.co.uk/
for Homebrew guitar amps and SPICE models

 

Leave a Comment

 

 

 

Canned Ebay Searches

Amps:
Microphones:
Effects:
Harmonicas and Gear:
Harmonica Music and Instruction:

 

 

 


JT30.com

Amps: www.HarpAmps.com
Tab: www.HarpTab.com
Contact Webmaster
Contact